Religious Beliefs, Diet, and Physical
Activity among Jewish Adolescents
Maureen R. Benjamins
Journal for the Scientific Study
of Religion, 51(3): 588-597
Despite
a well-documented connection between religion and mortality, the link between religion
and obesity-related outcomes and behaviors has not been adequately studied,
particularly among adolescents. The
current study adds to this literature by examining how the self-reported
influence of religious beliefs on physical activity and diet is related to the
actual behaviors in a sample of Jewish adolescents (n=351). The results show that reporting a stronger
influence of religious beliefs on health behaviors is associated with behaviors
related to physical activity, but not diet. In adjusted regression models, individuals who
report that their religious beliefs influence decisions about being physically active
“a lot” have significantly more active days per week than those who say their
religious beliefs do not influence such decisions (ß=.16, p<.05). Similar
effects are seen with regard to the students’ overall amount of sedentary time
(ß=-.32, p<.01; ß=-.28, p<.01, for “a lot” and “somewhat,” compared to
“not at all”). These results shed light
on previously documented relationships between religion and health, provide practical
implications for religious organizations and leaders, and suggest several specific
areas for future research.
Keywords: religion,
health behaviors, physical activity, diet, beliefs
Introduction
Studies continue to show religious variation in a wide
range of health-related outcomes, including mental health, physical health, and
mortality. Health behaviors, in addition to higher levels of social support and
better coping mechanisms, are thought to explain these relationships (Ellison and Levin 1998; Idler et al. 2003;
Krause and Ellison 2003; Pargament 1997). For example, attendance at religious services
is associated with less smoking, excessive drinking, and drug use, and more utilization
of preventive health services (e.g. Benjamins
2006; Gillum 2005, 2006; Hill et al. 2006; Nonnemaker et al 2003). Although fewer in number and less consistent,
some studies also link religious involvement to physical activity and diet among
adults (Ayers et al 2010; Hart et al 2004;
Hill et al. 2006, Salmoirago-Blotcher
et al 2011) and adolescents (Wallace
and Forman 1998). It is believed that having support for a healthy
lifestyle through informal or formal religious rules, social norms within a
religious group, and other congregation- and individual-level factors leads
more religious individuals to make these choices. However, there has been little research
explicitly linking an individual’s religious beliefs to health behaviors.
The current paper begins to address this gap in the literature by
examining how the reported influence of religious beliefs on health behaviors is
related to the actual behaviors in a sample of Jewish adolescents.
Literature
Review
Religious
Beliefs and Health
Although the majority of studies examining religion
and health behaviors focus on the influence of religious involvement (and primarily religious service attendance), a small
body of work has explored the impact of religious beliefs. Often, religious
beliefs are measured with a question that attempts to summarize the strength,
or salience, of religious beliefs in an individual’s life. Several studies have shown that salience is
negatively related to health-related behaviors, including smoking, drinking,
promiscuity, and use of preventive health services among adults (e.g. Assanangkornchai
et al. 2002; Benjamins 2007; Benjamins and Brown 2004; Krause 2003). Similar
relationships between spirituality and substance use were also seen among
adolescents (Hodge, Cardenas, and Montoya 2001; Miller, Davies, and Greenwald
2000; Nonnemaker et al. 2003).
Perhaps more relevant to the current study is the
small body of work exploring the role of religious beliefs that are specifically
related to health. One such belief that is often mentioned in
the religion-health literature (e.g., Ott 1991; Sweet 1994) is the notion that
the physical body is a "temple of God." Pargament and colleagues have conceptualized
and measured "sanctification," or the extent to which individuals
perceive the divine within a given object or practice, or attribute sacred
qualities to that object or practice. They
found sanctification of the body was an independent predictor of positive
health practices among college students (Pargament and Mahoney 2005); however, other
researchers have found that beliefs about the sanctity of the body were
unrelated to the use of preventive health services (Benjamins et al. 2011) and negatively
associated with having an annual physical (Ellison et al. 2008). In light of these
contradictory findings, more work in
this area is needed.
Another type of religious
belief that may influence health behaviors involves the concepts of control and
agency. Specifically, it has been
suggested that the extent to which individuals believe that God has control
over their life (including their physical health), as opposed to one's personal
agency and responsibility in such matters, influences health behaviors and
outcomes. A long tradition of research
has concluded that individuals with external locus of control tend to be less
proactive and have worse outcomes in various domains compared to individuals
who perceive a high level of personal efficacy or control (Rodin 1990; Zarit,
Pearlin, and Schaie 2003). However, less
research has specifically investigated the effects of perceived control by God
on health. Although contradictory
results also exist in this line of study, there is at least some evidence that
persons believing in a high level of divine control --especially, but not
exclusively, in the domain of health-- may exhibit more desirable psychosocial
outcomes, and perhaps better health behaviors, than others (e.g. Abrums 2000;
Holt, Lukwago, and Kreuter 2003; Johnson, Elbert-Avila, and Tulsky 2005;
Schieman et al. 2006; Wallston et al. 1999).
One additional type of
belief linking religion and health was examined using a sample of Presbyterian
women. Specifically, modest evidence was
found that women who believe that “spiritual health is supportive of physical
health” are more likely to utilize mammograms than other women (Benjamins,
Trinitapoli, and Ellison 2006). While
suggestive, research in other populations and with a broader array of outcomes
is needed to better understand the relationship of this type of belief with
health behaviors.
As alluded to above, most of the studies discussed
above that support linkages between religious beliefs and health behaviors were
conducted within adult samples. It is not known to what extent these
relationships (e.g. between sanctification and health practices) may also be
seen in adolescent populations, though the few existing studies on religion and
substance use suggest that religion and/or spirituality also has a beneficial
association with health behaviors among younger individuals (Hodge et al 2001;
Miller et al 2000; Nonnemaker et al. 2003). In the same vein, a recent review
of studies examining the relationship between religion and health among
adolescents also found that results in this area mirror those seen among adult
populations (Cotton et al 2006). However, none of these studies focus on Jewish
adolescents. Furthermore, few (if any) of the studies on adults examined the
relationship between religious beliefs and health behaviors separately by
religious denomination or focused on exclusively Jewish samples, although some did
include Jewish respondents (as discussed below).
Judaism and Health Behaviors
Numerous studies have found that Jewish individuals
utilize (or intend to utilize) more preventive health services than members of
other religious denominations (Benjamins and Brown 2004; Benajmins 2006; Bowen
et al 2003). In addition, research
conducted in Jerusalem has examined dietary and health behaviors among Jewish
individuals and revealed differential smoking and eating patterns by level of
orthodoxy (Friedlander et al 1985; Friedlander, Kark, and Stein 1987; Shmueli
and Tamir 2007). Beyond these studies,
very little research explores the connection between religion and health
behaviors among Jews (Levin and Prince 2011; Prince 2009).
The mechanisms proposed to explain such a
connection are similar to those suggested by studies of Christian populations,
such as increased social support and psychological resources. In addition,
theological and scriptural explanations involve specific commandments found in
the Torah and Talmud that might influence the health of those who follow these
Jewish texts. For example, Jewish
individuals are told to "take utmost care and watch yourselves
scrupulously" (Deuteronomy, 4:9). This
passage is understood by rabbis as a “mitzvah” (an obligation) to diligently
guard one's physical health (Talmud Berakhot 32b; Maimonides, Hilchot Rotzeah
11:4; Shulhan Arukh, Hoshen Mishpat 427:8). According to Maimonides,
the well-known Jewish rabbi and physician, this obligation not only precludes
negative health behaviors such as drug use, but also prescribes positive
behaviors such as physical activity and proper nutrition (Maimonides, Mishneh
Torah, Hilchot Deot 4:1). More broadly, Judaic texts emphasize an orientation
toward the current world (as opposed to the after-life) and numerous passages
focus specifically on avoiding that which is physically harmful (Feldman 1986).
These teachings are particularly important to Orthodox
Jews, the focus of the current study, whose belief that every single commandment
in the Torah must be followed results in strict guidelines covering almost all of
one’s daily activities (Kaplan 2005). As an example of the extent of the
directives for observant Jews, a popular book on how to manage an Orthodox
household includes 525 pages of instruction, covering everything from keeping
Kosher, to house-cleaning rules for certain holidays, to sexual relationships
between spouses (Greenberg 1983). Although it is not known whether or not religious
teachings, or any of the other possible mechanisms, have an impact on the
health behaviors of Jewish individuals, it is suspected they may help to
explain the previously documented advantages in mortality, self-rated health,
and other health outcomes seen for Jewish individuals (Eberstein and Heyman
2010; Kark et al 1996; Shkolnikov et al 2004), particularly for those belonging
to more conservative branches of Judaism (Levin 2011).
In sum, studies examining the impact of religious
beliefs on heath behaviors yield positive but inconsistent results and even
less is known specifically about Jewish individuals. The current study attempts to address these
gaps in the literature by examining how the reported influence of religious
beliefs on physical activity and diet is associated with the actual behaviors
in a sample of Jewish adolescents.
Methods
Data
Data come from surveys conducted in five Jewish (day)
schools in a large, Midwestern city as part of a larger project (Benjamins and
Whitman 2010). All of the students are Jewish and the majority are Orthodox.
The schools are all part of an Orthodox
school system, though the degree of orthodoxy varies. The surveys were administered
in class by teachers
during the spring of 2009 (and the fall of 2008 for one school). The surveys for 5th-8th
grade students measured eating habits, nutritional knowledge, physical
activity, and attitudes related to nutrition and physical activity. Whenever possible, validated questions were
taken from existing surveys, such as the Youth Risk Behavior Survey (YRBS) (CDC
2009). Both parental consent and child
assent were obtained before the surveys were conducted. The study was approved by the Sinai Health
System’s Institutional Review Board (IRB) and by each schools’ administration. The response rate for this wave of surveys
was 40%. The low rate is partially due
to the fact that the largest of the participating schools chose to use “active”
parental consent (i.e. opting in) instead of “passive” (i.e. opting out). Consequently, only 32 of the 240 students (13%)
at this school completed the survey (versus 51% of students at the remaining 5
schools). After exclusions for a small amount of missing data (less than 5% per
variable), the sample size for the regression analyses was reduced from 395 to
351 individuals.
Measures
Independent
Variables. The independent variables come from two
questions that ask, “Do your religious beliefs help you decide
whether to do (or not to do) the following things? Take care of yourself by being physically
active. Take care of yourself by eating
healthy.” The response
choices for both were: not at all, somewhat, or a lot.
Dependent
Variables. The primary variables of interest related to
physical activity were number of active days per week and daily sedentary
time. All came from the YRBS (CDC 2009). Active days per week was measured with a question
that asked on how many of the past seven days did the respondent participate in
60 minutes or more of physical activity (either moderate or vigorous, with a
definition and examples provided). Sedentary time was calculated using two
questions that asked about the number of hours spent playing computer or video
games, using the computer for something other than school work, and watching
television on an average school day.
Dependent variables related to diet and nutrition included eating
breakfast daily, drinking one or more soda a day, eating five or more fruits
and vegetables a day, and eating fast food once a week or more. The fruit and vegetable intake questions were
taken from the YRBS, as well as the soda intake.
Covariates. Demographic
variables include gender (0=Male, 1=Female) and grade (5th-8th). Several health-related covariates are also
included. Weight status is assessed with
a variable indicating whether or not the individual reported him- or herself as
being overweight. Another variable was
included to determine whether or not the respondent was dieting or exercising
specifically to lose weight or to keep from gaining weight. Parental involvement was measured with two
questions that asked whether or not a student’s parents encouraged the student
to be active and whether or not the parents were active with the student. Finally, students were asked how confident
they were with their ability to exercise or be physically active every day and
to choose to eat healthy foods most of the time.
Data Analysis
Data were analyzed with SAS
9.2. The range and mean (or proportions)
were provided for each variable. Next, the
mean (or proportion) was provided by level of the reported influence of
religious beliefs on both eating healthy and being active. An analysis of
variance (ANOVA) was run to test for significant differences among these
groups. Finally, multivariate regression models were used to estimate the unadjusted
and adjusted relationships between the religious belief variables and related
health behaviors. The physical activity outcomes (active days per week and
sedentary hours per day) are both count outcomes and initial tests for
overdispersion were significant. Thus,
negative binomial models were run.
(INSERT TABLE 1 ABOUT HERE)
Results
Descriptive statistics for all
variables are displayed in Table 1. The distribution of the two primary
variables of interest indicate that the students’ religious beliefs influence
them “somewhat”, on average, to take care of themselves by both eating healthy
and being physically active. Although
not shown, 37% of students said their religious beliefs influenced them “a lot”
to eat healthy and 36% said so in regards to being physically active. Not
surprisingly, students who reported an influence of religious beliefs on one
behavior were more likely to report an influence on the other behavior as well.
In this sample, a greater influence of religious
beliefs on eating behaviors was not significantly related to the demographic,
weight status, or dietary outcomes. In
contrast, the influence of religious beliefs on being active was significantly
related to active days per week, sedentary hours each day, being active with parents,
exercising to lose or maintain weight (moderately), and confidence in one’s
ability to be active (moderately).
(INSERT TABLE 2 ABOUT HERE)
Following these bivariate statistics, multivariate
regression models were run to better understand the relationships between the reported
influence of religious beliefs and the key outcomes of interest. As detailed
above, the primary variables of interest related to physical activity were
number of active days per week and daily sedentary time, while the variables of
interest related to diet and nutrition included eating breakfast daily, daily
soda, eating five or more fruits and vegetables a day, and eating fast food at
least weekly. The reported influence of religious beliefs was not significant
in any of the adjusted models predicting the dietary outcomes. The physical activity models are described
below.
Table 2 shows the unadjusted and adjusted negative
binomial regression estimates for the relationship between the reported influence
of religious beliefs on being active and the relevant behaviors. Model 1 reveals that, compared to those who
report that their religious beliefs do not influence their activity levels,
those who report that their beliefs influence activities “a lot” have
significantly more active days per week (β=.21, p<.01). When the demographic control variables are
added in Model 2, this association is slightly reduced but maintains
significance. Those reporting a small amount of influence are not significantly
different than those reporting no influence in terms of active days per week. In addition to religious beliefs, other
predictors of active days include gender, grade, parental encouragement, and
confidence in exercising.
The second set of models in Table 2 displays
regression estimates for the relationship between the influence of religious
beliefs on being active and sedentary hours per day. Model 1 reveals that individuals who report
that religious beliefs influence their decision to be active “a lot” or
“somewhat” have lower levels of sedentary time than those whose religious
beliefs do not influence their activity levels (β=-.30, p<.01; β=-.27,
p<.01, respectively). In the adjusted
model (Model 2), the associations between religious beliefs and the outcome
remain significant (β=-.32, p<.01; β=-.28, p<.01), along with parental
encouragement, exercising to lose weight, and confidence in exercising.
Discussion
This study adds to the religion and health literature
by examining (perhaps for the first time) the extent to which the explicitly
stated impact of religious beliefs on health behaviors are actually related to
such behaviors. It is well-established
that religious people tend to be healthier and that this can be partially
explained by healthier lifestyles (e.g. Ellison and Levin 1998). However, the evidence for a relationship
between religious involvement and obesity has been less clear (Cline and
Ferraro 2006; Gillum 2006; Shmueli and Tamir 2007). Furthermore, our understanding of how
religion is associated with obesity-related behaviors is limited, despite the
growing importance of these behaviors given the rise of obesity in the U.S. and
elsewhere. Thus, the current study is valuable for generating hypotheses
regarding such a connection.
To begin, the results presented here indicate that the
reported influence of religious beliefs on eating healthy and being physically
active is inconsistently associated with such behaviors. As expected, reporting a stronger influence
of religious beliefs on one’s behaviors was positively related to healthy
behaviors and negatively related to unhealthy ones. Moreover, in adjusted regression models, the
students’ assessments of the influence of religious beliefs on their activity
level was significantly related to the number of days they were physical
active, as well as to their overall amount of sedentary time. In contrast,
reporting a strong influence of religious beliefs on eating healthy was
unrelated to actual dietary practices in the regression models. It is not clear
why these conflicting results were found.
Previous studies have also shown inconsistent
relationships between religious beliefs and health behaviors. For example, although numerous studies of both
adults and adolescents have shown that salience is related to health-related
behaviors (e.g. Assanangkornchai et al. 2002; Benjamins and Brown 2004; Krause
2003; Hodge, Cardenas, and Montoya 2001; Miller, Davies, and Greenwald 2000;
Nonnemaker et al. 2003), one of the few existing studies on obesity-related
behaviors neglected to find a relationship between intrinsic religiosity and diet
(Hart et al. 2004). Perhaps
contradictory beliefs, such as believing one’s body to be a gift from God
versus believing in the ultimate control of God on one’s life, cancel each
other out. Or perhaps the motivation to
eat healthy is there (as reported), but the countervailing forces that exist in
a student’s life (including school, friends, parents, media, and other environmental
factors) prove to be too strong to overcome.
Explaining the positive relationship between the
influence of religious beliefs on physical activity and actual levels of
activity is also not straightforward. In particular, it is not necessarily
one’s religious beliefs, or even the beliefs of one’s chosen denomination, that
actually matter. Behavioral differences might also be associated with social
factors such as increased involvement with a religious organization or
community. For example, previous studies of Korean women in California revealed
that hearing anti-drinking messages from fellow members of one’s church was
related to a lowered likelihood of drinking (Ayers et al 2009) and that
obesity-related messages from congregants, in conjunction with messages from
religious leaders, was associated with a lower probability of being overweight
or obese (Ayers et al 2010). Faith-placed or faith-based health promotion
activities might also influence individuals to be more active by providing the
health education, motivation, and actual opportunities for exercise, in
addition to influencing social norms to be more supportive of an active
lifestyle within a congregation. Although 10% of U.S. congregations report explicitly
providing health-related programs (Trinitapoli, Ellison, and Boardman 2009),
little is known about how these programs affect individual relationships
between religion and health. Obviously, more research into these complex
relationships is needed.
As a first step, the analyses done here need to be
replicated in more representative samples that include individuals of all ages
and members of all religious denominations.
This research should address basic questions, such as, what percent of
adolescents and adults report that their religious beliefs influence their
health behaviors? Additional research is
also needed to explore these relationships in conjunction with other measures
of religious beliefs and involvement, as well as with different health
behaviors. The current study found a
relationship between a reported influence of religious beliefs and physical
activity outcomes, but not eating outcomes.
It would be interesting to see if this was true in other populations,
and to investigate possible reasons for these inconsistent findings. More investigation into possible mechanisms is
not only needed for the relationships seen here but, more broadly, to identify
the pathways connecting other aspects of religion to health behaviors.
Obviously, studies that are able to use longitudinal data to investigate the
impact of religious beliefs on health behaviors would be able to provide more
support for a causal relationship. Finally, more exploration into the aspects
of Jewish scripture, teachings, and cultural norms related to health behaviors
and outcomes would be helpful to provide more context to this growing line of
research. As just one example, differences in the relationships between
religion and health within different branches of Judaism could be examined.
There are also some practical implications of this
type of research. For example, religious organizations and leaders may want to
be more cognizant of the potential benefits of relating religious teachings and
values to health behaviors. Focusing on
religious teachings related to health from the pulpit or supporting
health-related educational efforts may be effective ways to motivate
congregants to take part in healthy activities such as exercise (Ayers et al.
2010). Specifically for the population
covered by the current study, perhaps it would be worthwhile for synagogues to
incorporate health-related programs or structures often seen in other religious
organizations, such as wellness ministries or parish nurses. Jewish day schools
may also want to emphasize the religious basis for health promoting activities
as a part of school wellness programs or health education classes. Given the prevalence of obesity among
children and adolescents, more attention needs to be paid to religion as one
factor that may help individuals to prevent weight gain, facilitate weight
loss, and/or maintain a healthy weight.
As with all studies, certain limitations of this study
should be taken into account. Most
obviously, the sample is not representative of all adolescents or even of all Jewish
adolescents. The individuals enrolled in
the schools participating in this study are most likely different from the
general population as well as from individuals who identify themselves as
Jewish. Specifically, they are almost
all Orthodox and, thus, are differentiated by specific beliefs, religious
guidelines, and social norms. A second
limitation is that all behaviors (and other measures) are self-reported. More accuracy could be attained through
measures such as accelerometers, food logs, or body mass index measurements,
for example. Moreover, as alluded to
above, the data are cross-sectional, which precludes the determination of
causality. Finally, unmeasured
variable(s), such as parental religiosity, could help to explain the associations
found here and more work is needed to explore these relationships.
Despite these limitations, this study supports previous
research that finds a connection between religious beliefs and health behaviors. Specifically, the findings suggest that the
majority of these Jewish adolescents are motivated by their religious beliefs to
be physically active and eat healthy. It is not just this self-reported
motivation that is important, but also the fact that the reported motivation is
significantly associated to levels of physical activity. More research is needed to better understand this
intriguing finding. These types of studies may help to explain the generally
salutary effects of religion on health outcomes, and may lead to more effective
interventions for adolescent well-being.
REFERENCES
Abrums, May. 2000. `Jesus will
fix it after awhile': Meanings and health. Social Science and Medicine 50: 89-105.
Assanangkornchai,
Sawitri, Katherie M. Conigrave, and John B. Saunders. 2002. Religious beliefs
and practice, and alcohol use in Thai men. Alcohol
and Alcoholism 37(2): 193-197.
Ayers, John W., C. Richard Hofstetter, Veronica L. Irvin, Yoonju Song,
Hae-Ryun Park, Hee-Yong Paik, Melbourne F. Hovell. 2009. Can religion help prevent obesity? Religious messages
and the prevalence of being overweight or obese among Korean women in
California. Journal for the Scientific
Study of Religion 49: 536–549.
Ayers, John W., C. Richard Hofstetter, Veronica L.
Irvin, Yoonju Song, Hae-Ryun Park, Hee-Yong Paik, Melbourne F. Hovell. 2010. Can religion help prevent obesity religious
messages and the prevalence of being overweight or obese among Korean women in
California. Journal for the Scientific
Study of Religion 49(3):536-549.
Benjamins, Maureen R. 2006. Religious influences on preventive health
care in a nationally representative sample of middle-age women. Journal of
Behavioral Medicine 29(1): 1-16.
Benjamins,
Maureen R. 2007. Predictors of preventive
health care use among middle-aged and older adults in Mexico: The role of religion.
Journal of Cross-Cultural Gerontology 22: 221-234.
Benjamins,
Maureen R. and Carolyn Brown. 2004. Religion
and preventative care utilization among the elderly. Social Science & Medicine 58:
109-118.
Benjamins, Maureen R.,
Christopher G. Ellison, Neal Kruase, and John Marcum. 2011. Religion and preventive service use: Do congregational
support and religious beliefs explain the relationship between attendance and utilization? Journal
of Behavioral Medicine 34(6): 462-476.
Benjamins, Maureen R., Jenny
Trinitapoli, and Christopher G. Ellison. 2006. Religious attendance, health
maintenance beliefs, and mammogram utilization: Findings from a nationwide
sample of Presbyterian women. Journal for
the Scientific Study of Religion 45,597-607.
Benjamins,
Maureen R. and Steven Whitman. 2010. A culturally
appropriate school wellness initiative: Results of a two-year pilot intervention
in two Jewish schools. Journal of School
Health 80(8):378-386.
Bowen, Deborah J., Roberta Singal, Eugenia Eng, Susan Crystal, and Wylie Burke. 2003 Jewish identity and intentions to obtain breast cancer screening. Cultural Diversity
and Ethnic Minority Psychology 9(1):79-87.
Centers
for Disease Control and Health Promotion. 2009. YRBSS: Youth Risk Behavior
Surveillance System. Retrieved from: http://www.cdc.gov/HealthyYouth/yrbs/index.htm.
Retrieved on: February 25, 2009.
Cline,
Krista M. and Kenneth F. Ferraro. 2006. Does religion increase the prevalence
and incidence of obesity in adulthood? Journal
for the Scientific Study of Religion 45: 269-281.
Cotton, Sian, Kathy Zebracki,
Susan L. Rosenthal, Joel Tsevat, and Dennis Drotar. 2006. Religion/spirituality
and adolescent health outcomes: a review. J
Adolesc Health 38(4):472-80.
Eberstein,
Isaac and K. Heyman. 2010. Jewish identity and self reported health. In
Christopher G. Ellison & Robert A. Hummer (eds.), Religion, families and
health: New directions in population based research. New Jersey: Rutgers
University Press.
Ellison,
Christopher G., Jinwoo Lee, Maureen R. Benjamins, Neal M. Krause, D. N. Ryan, and
John P. Marcum. (2008). Congregational support networks, health beliefs, and annual
medical exams: Findings from a nationwide sample of Presbyterians. Review of Religious Research 50(2),
176-193.
Ellison, Christopher G. and
Jeffrey S. Levin. 1998. The religion-health connection: Evidence, theory, and
future directions. Health Education and
Behavior 25, 700-720.
Feldman, David M. 1986. Health and medicine in the Jewish tradition
l'hayyim--to life. New York: Crossroad.
Friedlander, Yechiel, Kark,
Jeremy D., Kaufmann, Nathan A., and Stein, Yechezkiel. 1985. Coronary
heart disease risk factors among religious groupings in a Jewish population
sample in Jerusalem. American Journal of
Clinical Nutrition 42: 511-521.
Friedlander, Yechiel, Kark,
Jeremy D., and Stein, Yechezkiel. 1987. Religious observance and plasma lipids
and lipoproteins hmong 17-year-old Jewish residents of Jerusalem. Preventive Medicine 16: 70-79.
Gillum, R. Frank. 2005.
Frequency of attendance at religious services and cigarette smoking in American
women and men: The third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. Preventive
Medicine 41: 607-613.
Gillum,
R. Frank. 2006. Frequency of attendance at religious services, overweight, and obesity
in American women and men: The third National Health and Nutrition Examination
Survey. Annals of Epidemiology 16(9):
655-660.
Greenberg,
Blu. 1983. How to run a Traditional Jewish household. New
York: Simon and Schuster.
Hart,
Alton, Lesley Fels Tinker, Deborah J. Bowen Jessie Satie-About, and Dale McLerran.
2004. Is religious orientation associated with fat and fruit/vegetable intake?.
Journal of the American Dietetic
Association 104(8): 1292-1296.
Hill, Terrence D.,
Christopher G. Ellison, Amy M. Burdette, and Marc A. Musick. 2006. Religious
attendance and the health behaviors of Texas adults. Preventative Medicine,
42, 309-312.
Hodge David R., Paul Cardenas,
and Harry Montoya. 2011. Substance use: Spirituality and religious
participation as protective factors among rural youths. Social Work
Research. 25(3):153–161.
Holt, Cheryl L., Susan N.
Lukwago, and Matthew W. Kreuter. 2003. Spirituality, breast cancer beliefs, and
mammography utilization among urban African American women. Journal of Health Psychology 8: 383-396.
Idler, Ellen, Marc A. Musick, Christopher G.
Ellison, Linda K. George, Neal Krause, Jeff S. Levin, Marcia Ory, Kenneth I.
Pargament, Linda Powell, L.G. Underwood, and David R. Williams. 2003. Measuring multiple dimensions of
religion and spirituality or health research - Conceptual background and
findings from the 1998 General Social Survey. Research
on Aging, 25, 327-365.
Johnson, Kimberly S., Katja I.
Elbert-Avila, and James A. Tulsky. 2005. The influence of spiritual beliefs and
practices on the treatment preferences of African Americans: A review of the
literature. Journal of the American
Geriatric Society 53: 711-719.
Kaplan, Dana Evan. 2005.
Introduction. In: The
Cambridge companion to American Judaism. Ed. Dana Evan
Kaplan. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Kark, Jeremy D., Galia
Shemi, Yechiel Friedlander, Oz Martin, Orly Manor, and S. H. Blondheim. 1996.
Does Religious Observance Promote Health? Mortality in Secular vs Religious
Kibbutzim in Israel. American Journal of
Public Health 86(3):341-346.
Krause,
Neal. 2003. Race, religion, and abstinence from alcohol in late life. Journal of Aging and Health 15(2):
508-533.
Krause, Neal and Christopher
G. Ellison. 2003. Forgiveness by God, forgiveness of others, and psychological
well-being in late life. Journal for the
Scientific Study of Religion 42, 77-93.
Levin,
Jeff. 2011. Health impact of Jewish religious observance in the USA: Findings
from the 2000–01 National Jewish Population Survey. Journal of Religion and
Health 1-17.
Levin, Jeff and Michelle F. Prince. 2011. Judaism
and health: Reflections on an emerging scholarly field. Journal of Religion and Health 50(4): 765-777.
Miller, Lisa, Mark Davies, and Steven Greenwald.
2000. Religiosity and substance use and abuse among adolescents in the NCS. Journal
of the American Academy of child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 39,
1190-1197.
Nonnemaker,
J. M., Clea A. McNeely, and Robert W. Blum 2003. Public and private domains of
religiosity and adolescent health risk behaviors: evidence from the National
Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Health. Social
Science and Medicine 57: 2049-2054.
Ott, P. 1991. John Wesley on
health as wholeness. Journal of Religion
and Health 30: 43-57.
Pargament, Kenneth I. 1997. The psychology of religion and coping.
New York: Guilford.
Pargament, Kenneth I. and
Annette Mahoney. 2005. Sacred matters: Sanctification as a vital topic for the
psychology of religion. International
Journal for the Psychology of Religion 15, 179-198.
Prince, Michelle F. 2009.
Judaism, health, and healing: How a new Jewish communal field took root and where
it might grow. Journal of Jewish Communal
Service 84: 280-291.
Rodin, Judith. 1990. Control
by any other name: Definitions, concepts, and processes. Pp. 1-17 in Self-Directedness: Cause and Effects
Throughout the Life Course, edited by J. Rodin, C. Schooler, and K.W.
Schaie. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Salmoirago-Blotcher, Elena,
George Fitchett, Judy Ockene, Eliezer Schnall, Sybil Crawford, Iris Granek,
JoAnn Manson, Ira Ockene, Mary O'Sullivan, Lynda Powell, Stephen Rapp. 2011.
Religion and healthy lifestyle behaviors among postmenopausal women: the
women's health initiative. Journal of
Behavioral Medicine 34(5):360-371.
SAS
Institute Inc. 2008. Version 9.2. Cary, NC.
Schieman, Scott H., Tetyana
Pudrovska, Leonard I. Pearlin, and Christopher G. Ellison. 2006. The sense of
divine control and mental health in late life: Moderating effects of race and socioeconomic
status. Journal for the Scientific Study
of Religion 45: 529-549.
Shkolnikov Vladimir M.,
Andreev E.M., Anson J., Meslé F. 2004. The peculiar pattern of
mortality
of Jews in Moscow, 1993-95. Population Studies, 58(3), pp. 311-329.
Shmueli,
Amir and Dov Tamir. 2007. Health behavior and religiosity among Israeli Jews. Israel Medical Association Journal 9:
703-707.
Sweet, Leonard I. 1994. Health and healing in the Evangelical
tradition. Valley Forge, PA: Trinity Press International.
Trinitapoli,
Jenny, Christopher G. Ellison, and Jason D. Boardman. 2009. US religious congregations
and the sponsorship of health-related programs. Social Science and Medicine 68:2231-2239.
Wallace, John M., Jr., and
Tyrone A. Forman. 1998. Religion's role in promoting health and reducing risk
among American youth. Health Education
and Behavior 25: 721-741.
Wallston, Kenneth A., Vanessa
L. Malcarne, Lise Flores, Ingunn Hansdottir, Craig A. Smith, Mitchell J. Stein,
Michael H. Weisman, and Philip J. Clements. 1999. Does God determine your
health? The God locus of control scale. Cognitive
Therapy and Research 23: 131-142.
Zarit, Steven H., Leonard I.
Pearlin, and K.Warner Schaie (eds.). 2003. Personal
control in social and life course contexts. New York: Springer.
Table 1. Means or
Proportions of Covariates by the Level of Influence of Religious Beliefs on
Eating Healthy and
Being Active (n=351)a
|
Total Sample
|
Religious Beliefs
Influence Eating
|
Religious Beliefs
Influence Activity
|
|||||||
|
Range
|
Mean or Proportion
|
Not at All
|
Some-what
|
A Lot
|
F-test b
|
Not at All
|
Some-what
|
A
Lot
|
F-test
|
Influence of Religious Beliefs on Eating Healthy
|
1-3
|
2.16
|
--
|
--
|
--
|
|
1.27
|
2.12
|
2.88
|
***
|
Influence of Religious Beliefs on Being Active
|
1-3
|
2.09
|
1.15
|
1.96
|
2.77
|
***
|
--
|
--
|
--
|
|
Female
|
0-1
|
0.58
|
.54
|
.58
|
.61
|
|
.54
|
.60
|
.58
|
|
Grade
|
5-8
|
6.28
|
6.11
|
6.32
|
6.33
|
|
6.20
|
6.41
|
6.22
|
|
Overweight
|
0-1
|
0.30
|
.33
|
.30
|
.29
|
|
.31
|
.33
|
.26
|
|
Daily Breakfast
|
0-1
|
0.58
|
.67
|
.53
|
.55
|
|
|
|
|
|
Daily Soda
|
0-1
|
0.13
|
.15
|
.14
|
.11
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 Fruits/Vegetables Daily
|
0-1
|
0.28
|
.23
|
.26
|
.34
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fast Food Weekly
|
0-1
|
0.37
|
.37
|
.35
|
.39
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dieting to Lose Weight
|
0-1
|
0.44
|
.38
|
.40
|
.50
|
|
|
|
|
|
Confidence in Eating Healthy
|
1-3
|
2.62
|
2.58
|
2.56
|
2.90
|
|
|
|
|
|
Active Days
|
0-7
|
4.05
|
|
|
|
|
3.83
|
3.58
|
4.73
|
***
|
Sedentary Time
|
0-8
|
2.00
|
|
|
|
|
2.44
|
1.87
|
1.81
|
**
|
Parents Encourage Activity
|
0-1
|
0.26
|
|
|
|
|
.22
|
.23
|
.32
|
|
Active with Parents
|
0-1
|
0.59
|
|
|
|
|
.58
|
.51
|
.67
|
*
|
Exercising to Lose Weight
|
0-1
|
0.57
|
|
|
|
|
.49
|
.55
|
.64
|
+
|
Confidence in Exercising Daily
|
1-3
|
2.71
|
|
|
|
|
2.65
|
2.66
|
2.81
|
+
|
a The
number of cases may vary slightly due to missing data
b ANOVAs
are used to test the significance of the differences in means (or proportions)
across groups
+ p<.10, * p<.05, ** p<.01, *** p<.001
Table 2. Estimating
the Unadjusted and Adjusted Associations between the Influence of Religious Beliefs
on Being Active and Two Measures of Physical Activity (n=351)a
|
Active Days
|
Sedentary Time
|
||||||
|
Model 1
|
Model 2
|
Model 1
|
Model 2
|
||||
Influence of Religious Beliefs on Activity (Not At All)b
A Lot
Somewhat
|
.21
-.07
|
**
|
.16
-.04
|
*
|
-.30
-.27
|
**
**
|
-.32
-.28
|
**
**
|
Female (Male)
|
|
|
-.28
|
***
|
|
|
-.03
|
|
Grade
|
|
|
-.09
|
***
|
|
|
.03
|
|
Parents Encourage Activity
|
|
|
.15
|
*
|
|
|
.19
|
*
|
Active with Parents
|
|
|
.02
|
|
|
|
.02
|
|
Exercising to Lose Weight
|
|
|
-.003
|
|
|
|
.18
|
*
|
Confidence in Exercising Daily (Not)
Confident
Neutral
|
|
|
.55
.12
|
***
|
|
|
-.35
-.25
|
*
|
Log-likelihood
AIC
|
583.73
1573.27
|
632.77
1489.19
|
-207.05
1208.74
|
-201.34
1211.32
|
a Negative binomial regression estimates
b Reference group in parentheses
* p<.05, ** p<.01, *** p<.001
No comments:
Post a Comment